Yeah we have so many people going "It's Nathan!" "It's Sylar!" "It's Linderman!" it would be just like them to pull the rug out from under our feet and go "HAHA guess WHAT? It really WAS HRG! NER NER!" LOL And you're right. She would fully let loose on him because he really did hurt his own daughter, and all that heartbreak he suffered would have been much more meaningful. And can u think, HRG backstory, maybe the fact he discovered this special woman and her child led him to delve into the supernatural-peopled business in the first place! So he could help his baby! *grins* Besides *whispers* I've just read 2 summaries that were exactly the same word for word except the last part - instead of saying that Claire takes her anger out on her "real father" the 2nd one said "HRG". Can I hope someone slipped up? (A)
Oh I do hope they are being incredibly misleading. What if it WAS Claude and that scene was flashing back to 17 years ago when they first lost her? He could have been all business-like before becoming a hobo... haha. You never know what's around the bend. But on one hand I do think they like us to speculate because we probably end up giving them story ideas and push them to keep ahead of the rest of us ideas wise. Honestly, I don't think I could be surprised by anything now, we've exhausted every possible option. It'd have to be absolutely HUGE to be something we haven't thought about.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 10:54 am (UTC)Oh I do hope they are being incredibly misleading. What if it WAS Claude and that scene was flashing back to 17 years ago when they first lost her? He could have been all business-like before becoming a hobo... haha. You never know what's around the bend. But on one hand I do think they like us to speculate because we probably end up giving them story ideas and push them to keep ahead of the rest of us ideas wise. Honestly, I don't think I could be surprised by anything now, we've exhausted every possible option. It'd have to be absolutely HUGE to be something we haven't thought about.